American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska

ACLU Nebraska | 941 ‘O’ Street, Suite 706 | Lincoln, NE 68508
(402) 476-8091 | info@aclunebraska.org
Because Freedom Can't Defend Itself

Navigate

En Espanol

Membership and Contributions

Contact ACLU Nebraska

Mission and Principles

Frequently Asked Questions

Publications and Newsletters

Legal Program

Board of Directors

Calendar

Links

ACLU Nebraska Legal Program - Racial Discrimination

ACLU Nebraska Legal Program - Racial Discrimination

Click here to learn more about ACLU Nebraska's other Legal Program areas.

Most complaints of racial discrimination we handle involve police misconduct. Click here to read more about those cases involving racial discrimination and the police.

Marriage license discrimination uncovered, challenged, and resolved for a "Happy Ever After" ending.  Five counties in Nebraska were caught refusing marriage licenses to new immigrants.  The counties (Dawson, Hall, Lincoln, Phelps and Platte) actually told ACLU clients and undercover ACLU testers that the law required certain types of documentation before a license could be granted....but the requirements were made up.  Some counties insisted on proof the person was here legally.  Some counties insisted on a Social Security card for citizenship.  Some counties said no photo ID would be accepted if it was from a foreign country (such as a passport or driver's license from another nation).  All of these requirements were beyond what state law requires, and ACLU Nebraska challenged the requirements as being racially biased against new immigrants--especially against new Hispanic immigrants.  After a threat of a lawsuit, the counties backed down and changed their policies.  Read the letter we sent them here.  This summer, ACLU wrote a letter to every single other county clerk to remind everyone that marriage licenses must be given to all applicants, regardless of their nationality or race or citizenship status.  (July, 2009)

Night owl laws in Omaha are unenforceable.  The Omaha City Council passed an ordinance essentially making it illegal for people to hang out between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m.  If someone is caught committing a crime, all the other people (who weren't doing anything except hanging out nearby) can be ordered to disperse for no reason now--or they'll face a criminal ticket.  ACLU Nebraska objects to the law, since it was clearly designed to intimidate and target people in minority neighborhoods.  We've written to the City of Omaha, warning that any enforcement of the law will be challenged in court.  Read a copy of the letter here.  Contact us if you learn about someone being ticketed!  (March, 2009)

ACLU Joins Former Black Panther in Asking for New Trial.  Edward Poindexter has been in prison since 1970 for a crime he may not have committed. ACLU Nebraska's amicus brief in his case was submitted to the Nebraska Supreme Court, asking the judges to consider whether Poindexter was a victim of the FBI program COINTELPRO.  COINTELPRO was an unconstitutional effort to target dissident minority voices, including those of black leaders in both the civil rights movement and in the more controversial Black Panther movement.  ACLU Nebraska urged the court to recall the intense racial discrimination present in the time surrounding the events of Poindexter's conviction and to view the prosecution's case with some skepticism as a result.  Download the brief here. Unfortunately, the Nebraska Supreme Court rejected Poindexter's appeal and denied him any further hearing in his case.  ACLU will continue to work with Poindexter's attorneys as he seeks relief in the federal court system.  (June, 2009)

Lubna Hussein is a Muslim woman, originally from Egypt. In the summer of 2003, she went to an Omaha public pool with her three young daughters and a friend. The pool employees refused to allow Lubna in, claiming her modest clothing and Muslim head scarf were not permitted. Lubna and her daughters saw other people in the pool area who were wearing street clothing, but they still were refused entry. Lubna returned on a second occasion and tried to explain her religious beliefs required her to wear her scarf and clothing--she explained she only wanted to watch her children swim, not swim herself. Again, though other people--who were white--were in the pool area in regular clothes, Lubna was denied entry. We filed suit in the spring of 2004, charging the city of Omaha with racial discrimination as well as religious and gender discrimination. The case was settled in February, 2005, with a change in the pool dress code policies to allow anyone with religious clothing to enter pool facilities in the future.

Read the Lawsuit Filing Press Release in Adobe PDF Format. (June, 2004)

Read the Lawsuit Settlement Press Release in Adobe PDF Format. (February, 2005)