Considered alone, a bill to create a new crime or to increase the penalty for an existing crime might seem straightforward and innocuous to the growth of the prison population.  Focusing on the categories of crime individually does not always reflect significant prison numbers.  However, when taken in the aggregate, year after year, the lawmaking practice of continually creating new crimes and lengthening sentences for existing crimes causes the tide of imprisonment to rise. It is mass incarceration by a thousand cuts.

Date

Friday, October 20, 2017 - 3:15pm

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Hide sidebar

Related issues

Criminal Justice

Documents

Show related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

274

The last year was a relentless attack on civil rights and civil liberties emanating from the highest echelons of political power and emboldening state and local leaders to act in ways previously unimaginable.
Nevertheless, we persisted, we resisted, and we achieved important progress.
Our small but mighty team of four people grew to seven, adding a development associate and two new attorneys.
Your generous support makes our work possible.
Thank you.

Legal Program

  • WON a victory for children in Nebraska and LGBT parents striking down Nebraska’s ban on gay and lesbian foster parents through Stewart v. Heineman at the Nebraska Supreme Court
  • Filed Sabata v. Nebraska Department of Corrections et al, a historic class-action federal court case challenging conditions of confinement in Nebraska’s prisons as a result of dangerous overcrowding
  • Filed State ex rel Miller v. Frakes in State Court to force compliance with open records law to reveal supplier of lethal injection drugs
  • Filed Sandoval v. Ricketts in state court to challenge aspects of the 2016 death penalty referendum
  • Filed ACLU v Dept Homeland Security in federal court to force disclosure of public records in Muslim Ban Executive Orders
  • Filed an amicus brief in the Beatrice Six federal court death penalty case
  • Filed an amicus brief in Coble v. Nebraska state court case to support record sealing for juvenile offenders
  • Filed an appearance in Hoaglin v. Nebraska, a state court case challenging Lincoln panhandling ordinances on First Amendment and won dismissal of criminal charges on behalf of our client experiencing homelessness
  • Filed appearance in Vandolah v. Nebraska, a state court case challenging small towns criminal charges against our client for erecting a provocative sign in his yard on First Amendment grounds and won dismissal
  • Filed a habeas petition in state court, In re M.S., successfully challenging our 16-year-old client’s incarceration and placement in solitary confinement stemming from a minor drug offense
  • Prepared litigation & facilitated 100+ citizen contacts successfully urging Nebraska’s Secretary of State to protect voter data from the Trump/Kobach “Election Integrity” Commission
  • Filed an emergency demand letter with Douglas County jail to secure medical treatment for a pregnant detainee
  • Filed an emergency demand letter to Buffalo County jail to secure diabetic treatment for a detainee
  • Filed an emergency demand letter to Lincoln & Buffalo County jails to secure mental health medications for detainees
  • Filed emergency demand letter to Dawson County jail to provide medical treatment to detainee living with HIV
  • Filed demand letter to Blair Public Schools to cease and desist unwarranted student cell phone searches

Policy Advocacy

Community Empowerment

  • Conducted 84 speaking events reaching over 20,000 Nebraskans in person including know your rights presentations to Muslim communities, DACA youth and at immigrants and refugees’ rallies, Womens’ Marches, and trans students rights rallies
  • Partnered with Unity in Action to help lead the fight against a 287(g) application filed by the Dakota County Sheriff to deputize officers as federal immigration agents
  • Delivered a petition to Governor Ricketts & Department of Corrections with 2,000 signatures successfully challenging secrecy in death penalty protocols
  • Launched 10,000 calls to State Senators to save Title X reproductive healthcare for rural and low-income women
  • Launched 250 calls to State Senators to override Governor Ricketts veto of ex-felon voting rights
  • Delivered over 350 emails to Department of Corrections Director Scott Frakes asking him to stop charging women for access to feminine hygiene products
  • Launched statewide Transgender Voices Tour across greater Nebraska hosting town hall meetings to introduce Nebraskans to their transgender neighbors
  • Launched a statewide tour with the Platte Institute on second chance employment and occupational licensing reform
  • Launched an innovative deep canvassing pilot program in Lincoln making contact with hundreds of Nebraskans to change hearts and minds on trans rights and build capacity among LGBTQ leaders

Date

Friday, December 22, 2017 - 1:45pm

Featured image

Text: The last year was a relentless attack on civil rights and civil liberties. Nevertheless, we persisted, we resisted, & we achieved important progress. Thank you.

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Hide sidebar

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Text: The last year was a relentless attack on civil rights and civil liberties. Nevertheless, we persisted, we resisted, & we achieved important progress. Thank you.

Related issues

Criminal Justice LGBT Rights Reproductive Freedom Immigrants' Rights Police Practices Freedom of Expression and Religion Voting Rights Privacy Open Government Youth and Schools

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

273

No one should be in jail simply because of the size of their bank account. Yet in Nebraska and around the country, thousands of individuals are simply too poor to pay fines and fees issued by the courts. Practices that were outlawed in the 19th century are still leading to poor people being trapped in a maze that only has one conclusion: mass incarceration.

A year ago, the ACLU told the story of Janet, a woman who was experiencing homelessness and living out of her car. She was one of the many individuals the ACLU’s report on bail and modern-day debtors’ prisons in Nebraska highlighted. One year later, we decided to check back in with county courts in Douglas and Lancaster counties to see how Nebraska judges are imposing fines and fees today. Had judges changed their practices to tailor the fines and fees to the individual and their ability to pay? Sadly, the short answer seems to be no.

Are you facing fines and fees from a court? Know Your Rights

We spent a total of two days in Douglas and Lancaster Counties this November to see how courts were responding to the ACLU’s report, bipartisan reforms from the Nebraska Legislature, and the nationwide movement to reform modern-day debtors’ prisons. At these initial hearings, most defendants were told of their charges, pled guilty, and were sentenced to a fine without any inquiry into their ability to pay—and with no attorney present—in a single one-stop-shop process taking less than five minutes. As practicing attorneys, we were surprised to see many of the same concerning practices we saw a year ago continuing.

  • Rather than giving each individual a notice of their rights and ensuring they understood their rights, most rights advisories were given as a group. The judge read off the advisory at the beginning of the session and then never repeated it, even though many people arrived later and never heard the advisory.
  • We never observed a court letting someone know they could request a waiver of fines or fees if they could demonstrate they could not afford to pay. We saw no instances where the judge asked a defendant about their ability to pay before imposing fines and fees.
  • If someone asked for an attorney, even if their offense held the possibility of jail time, we saw that judges would not appoint public defenders because the prosecutor was not seeking jail time in that specific case. Many of the individuals before the court ultimately do end up in jail when they can’t pay their fines—and yet they never had an attorney.

Courts need to stop people from getting trapped in a maze of fines and fees. We’re working to empower individuals and advocates to take action on their own by providing forms and instructions to help poverty-stricken Nebraskans in court.

Debtors’ prison practices in Nebraska courts are unconstitutional and inhumane. Nebraskans from across the political spectrum have seen that these practices do nothing to support public safety. It is time for Nebraska’s courts to use the discretion they h-ve and for each of us to know about our rights in court.

The reality is that these practices are hurting Nebraskans. Here are just a few stories of people who were in court on the days we observed. Their names and certain identifying information have been changed to protect their identities.

Stacey

Stacey is a 35-year-old single mother of two who was charged with theft. She was accused of stealing less than $10 of household items from a local dollar store when she thought she had store credit for returned merchandise. Stacey decided she would plead guilty to the charge so she wouldn’t have to come to court again and find child care for her children. Without asking about her financial situation, the judge ordered that Stacey pay $200 plus court costs. Because she could not afford the fine, Stacy could face jail time for a misunderstanding around $10 of merchandise.

Steven

Steven is a 45-year-old Asian man who does not speak English and appeared in court with an interpreter. Steven was charged with not having car insurance, speeding and other car-related offenses. Steven did not understand the ticket and didn’t know he needed to go to court and a failure to appear charge was also added. Steven told the judge that he had just gotten the vehicle and was taking his son to school when he got pulled over. Steven’s fines totaled more than $300. After the judge imposed the fines, Steven told the judge that he is sick and cannot work. He asked how he will be able to pay such a large amount. Though the judge said he could work out a payment plan and possibly do community service instead of paying the fine, Steven, like many defendants, left the courtroom with a great sense of uncertainty. Even with the payment plan would he be able to afford the large fine? Given his physical ailments, would he even be able to complete community service? If he can't pay the fine or complete community service, Steven could end up in jail.

Camila

Camila is a 19-year-old Latina woman who was charged with resisting arrest and disorderly conduct following an incident at her parent’s house. Prior to Camila coming into the courtroom, the presiding Judge gave an oral rights advisory to the entire room. However, Camila had come in late and did not hear the rights advisory. Camila did not have an attorney at her side and looked intimidated. The judge noted that although Camila had already been in jail for a day she was eligible for a diversion program. Camila asked for more information, including if there was a cost to enroll in the program. The judge answered "about $200.00," but if Camila wished to waive the program the judge would credit the day Camila stayed in jail and she would only owe $50. Because Camila could not afford $200 for the diversion program, these charges will remain on her permanent record.

Despite the concerning practices that remain in effect, work has been done to address the maze of fines and fees that leads to people being jailed simply because they can't afford their fines. LB 259, which goes into full effect in July 2019, makes changes to how fines are imposed and enforced.

Learn more about your rights with fines and fees in court.

Date

Monday, December 18, 2017 - 8:45am

Featured image

Stylized photo of a handcuffed man in court

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Hide sidebar

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Stylized photo of a handcuffed man in court

Related issues

Criminal Justice

Show related content

Pinned related content

Authors:
Rose Godinez
Scout Richters

Menu parent dynamic listing

273

Pages

Stay informed

ACLU of Nebraska is part of a network of affiliates

Learn more about ACLU National
Subscribe to ACLU of Nebraska RSS